June 2003
2.
3.
4.
Diagnosis: Cutaneous Fusariosis
Histopathology: A biopsy for H + E (Figure 2) revealed a granulomatous dermatitis with septate fungal organisms demonstrating a "ribbon-like" appearance in the mid-reticular dermis. GMS weakly stained the fungal forms (Figure 3). Staining for acid-fast bacilli and tissue gram stains were negative. Histologically, Fusarium is often difficult to distinguish from Aspergillus.1 Both demonstrate septate hyphae with acute-angled branching, and they both invade the dermal vasculature, causing thrombosis and tissue infarction.2 Fungal cultures stained with lactophenol cotton blue (Figure 4) demonstrated clusters of multiseptate, "canoe-shaped" macroconidia which are characteristic of Fusarium (1,2).
Course: The patient was initially treated with an intravenous amphotericin B lipid complex and subsequently switched to Voriconazole 200 mg twice daily. He also underwent debridement of the lesion. Upon follow-up, the patient's wound was healing well via second intention, and healthy granulation tissue covered the base of the wound. There were no signs of wound infection. He denied fever and chills, and no further skin findings were noted upon physical exam. His wound care regimen included dressing changes bid, Keflex, and topical polysporin ointment. He may require a skin graft in the future for complete wound healing.
Discussion: Fusarium, a ubiquitous, saprophytic
fungus, is a known human pathogen. In the immunocompetent host,
it is generally localized to the skin or nail plate, though it
has been known to superinfect wounds and ulcers, particularly
in burn patients (3). In immunocompromised patients, primary
cutaneous fusariosis similarly occurs at sites where the skin
barrier has been disrupted (such as surgical wounds, IV catheter
sites, or arthropod bites), and is most commonly seen on the distal
extremities. In such cases, focal excision of the infection in
addition to antifungal treatment and resolution of neutropenia
may prevent or delay progression to disseminated infection (4
).
Disseminated fusariosis almost exclusively affects immunocompromised
patients, especially in the setting of hematological malignancies,
chemotherapy, or a BMT with prolonged or severe neutropenia (i.e.
an absolute neutrophil count <500/ul) (5 ). Disseminated fusariosis
may be marked by fever, myalgias, and fungemia, with cutaneous
involvement in occurring in over 70% of patients. The cutaneous
lesions of disseminated Fusarium infection typically begin
as erythematous or gray macules which evolve into an erythematous
plaque containing a central ulceration or black eschar (6). The
severity of the infection generally correlates with the degree
and duration of neutropenia (7 ). However, it has been documented
that bone marrow transplant patients or those who experience GVHD,
even after resolution of neutropenia, are at increased risk for
disseminated Fusarium infection. This may be due to the
finding that lymphocyte function is impaired for up to one year
following a BMT.
In summary, it is vital to biopsy and culture skin lesions that are characteristic for Fusarium in neutropenic patients. For in this subset of patients: 1) early treatment of localized cutaneous disease may prevent dissemination, and 2) disseminated fusariosis carries a mortality rate of up to 90% despite aggressive antifungal treatment and efforts to reverse profound neutropenia, such as with GM-CSF therapy (6,8,9).
References:
1. Bushelman SJ, Callen JP, Roth DN, Cohen LM. Disseminated
Fusarium solani
infection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:346-351.
2. Veglia KS, Marks VJ. Fusarium as a pathogen: a case report
of Fusarium sepsis and
review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:260-263.
3. Antony SJ. Disseminated Fusarium in an immunocompromised
host. Int J Dermatol.
1996;11:815-816.
4. Musa MO, Eisa AA, Halim M, Sahovic E, Gyger M, Chaudhri N,
et al. The spectrum
of Fusarium infection in immunocompromised patients
with haematological
malignancies and in nonimmunocompromised patients: a single
institution experience
over 10 years. Br J Haematol. 2000;108:544-548.
5. Gamis AS, Gudnason T, Giebink GS, Ramsay NKC. Disseminated
infection with
Fusarium in recipients of bone marrow transplants.
Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:1077
1088.
6. Bodey GP, Boktour M, Mays S, Duvic M, Kontoyiannis D, Hachem
R, Raad I. Skin
lesions associated with Fusarium infection. J Am Acad
Dermatol. 2002;47:659-666.
7. Caux F, Aractingi S, Baurmann H, Reygagne P, Dombret H, Romand
S, et al.
Fusarium solani cutaneous infection in a neutropenic
patient. Dermatology.
1993;186:232-235.
8. Mowbray DV, Paller AS, Nelson PE, Kaplan RL. Disseminated Fusarium
solani
infection with cutaneous nodules in a bone marrow transplant
patient. Int J Dermatol.
1988;10:698-702.
9. Prins C, Chavaz P, Tamm K, Hauser C. Ecthyma gangrenosum-like
lesions: a sign of
disseminated Fusarium infection in the neutropenic
patient. Clinical and Experimental
Dermatology. 1995;20:428-430.
This case was presented by Drs. Michael Nelson, Michael Heffernan, and Jennifer Gardner.